I’ve been thinking a lot about Michael Jackson–my kids are currently obsessed with his songs and his dance moves (son just recovered from a really bad muscle tear from trying to dance like Michael)–and I admit a lot of the songs they’re listening to are taking me back in a very fond way. Like the Billie Jean video–they notice the same things I did–like how not all the concrete slabs light up when he touches them and what the fuck does that tiger mean?

But this is the video I’ve really become obsessed with:

I remember when it came out–how most of the people in my neighborhood had some comment to say about the touching and the rotating and dirty dirty man. Most of the kids loved it, the adults hated it. I personally cringed then and I admit, I cringe now. But now I have the words to say why.

I grew up with a very conservative idea of what masculinity looked like. Working class, religious conservative, “good” immigrants, etc all combined to create the idea that “real men” didn’t go grabbing their thingies (although there was never much of a problem with men like Dr. Dre doing the same thing), or rotating those hips or or or or…

And as a good girl, as a good girl who was secretly a butch trying to model herself on the idea of masculinity she most respected, her conservative working class Mexican father–ai, Jesus. It was a shock to my system to see that the masculinity of my father was turned on its head so dramatically (now, i would call it, “challenging masculinity”–but then, I didn’t have the words). I didn’t understand Michael Jackson to be a fag or a homo or any of those words–I understood him to be … embarrassing. Real men don’t have to grab their dicks like that. Real men are John Wayne. Who are just there. Who “do the right thing.” Like providing for the kids. And working until they collapse. And finding a good woman to rub his thingy, rather than doing it himself.

That idea of what makes “masculinity” is hard to get rid of. I still cringe now for exactly that reason. If I want to model masculinity–how on earth can I model *that*? When *I* do that, I’m just a piece of ass, a pussy to fuck (as much as a fat, baseball dykish type queer girl can be a pussy piece of ass, haha)?

But now, I have a son. I have a son that is growing up in a world where masculinity is expressed almost exclusively through a sexualized relationship with women. That is, Dr. Dre grabbing his cock in the middle of a concert is ok fucking kay–because we all know–he is grabbing that cock as a way to model studliness. Machoness. He’s using that cock to fuck women. Or, women’s asses. Or their bitchy mouths. etc. (and not meaning to target Dr. Dre here, this is relevant to, oh, all gangsta mainstream rappers). He’s using his cock to assert his authority, to wield power.

The thing about Michael Jackson…the thing that made/makes me uncomfortable….is that you can’t say the same thing. Even in his music videos that are about women (i.e. dirty diana, billie jean, etc), women do not play a major role or carry even a major presence. Which, this could be looked at in a negative way–he’s not giving women actresses a chance to represent or challenge his representation of them. But…I see it in a different way. I see it as an opportunity, and intervention, for masculinity.

You can’t say Michael Jackson is defining his cock in relationship to the subjugation of women–because the women in the black and white video (as an example), are his equals. Fellow dancers. People who enjoy moving their bodies, just like he does. (the one glaring exception with this assertion is his “the way you make me feel” video which has aggressive street harassment, but ultimately ends with a hug rather than a hooking up).

So when MJ goes into the back street to do his nasty dance, he is grabbing and zipping up…for reasons that many of us can’t even fathom…because it’s a man expressing sexuality that is not in service of women’s subjugation. It’s a man expressing sexuality that is not about power–at least not that kind of power.

And it makes many of us, including me, uncomfortable–to the point that we don’t even know how to understand what we are seeing. There is literally no point of reference in our history. (and for me, the butch wanna be–I didn’t understand it, how can you express masculinity without a woman in the picture? Isn’t butchness as much about who you are attracted to as it is “expressing masculinity?” ai, dios mio).

As I watch this video more and more though, I see it through the eyes of my son. Of my son who hurt his leg trying to dance like MJ. I see it through his eyes, and I see joy. I see a man who loves to dance. Who loves to dance so much, sometimes it makes him feel sexual and excited. A man who loves to dance so much, sometimes, he can’t contain everything inside himself, and masturbation and sexualness just flows out of him in a way that feels good, looks good, has humor to it, and is only dependent upon his own needs. He doesn’t need a credit card on a woman’s ass or a dog collar around a woman…cuz he has his dancing. He has himself.

I see that through my son’s eyes. And the way my son sits in the back seat of our car, with the MJ jamming super loud, and how his fingers start the tapping, and eventually his whole body is shaking in rhythm to Bad. I see that uncontrollable feeling in his body welling and welling until he can’t sit still any more, and I know that someday, he’ll be sweaty and hot from dancing and feel sexual urges–and I know that he’ll have seen a different way of expressing those urges. That natural joy.

And so while I can’t call MJ “liberatory” or “revolutionary” or what have you… I do say…he’s provided something for a woman worried about how her son will live in this world. And it makes me so extraordinarily sad to know that Anxious Black Woman’s words are the truth:

Not one artist who “graced” last night’s stage is worthy enough to step into the King’s shoes, and it pains me to think that Michael Jackson died without one potential artist to pass the torch to.

He was a man who danced with his sister in a public space–as an equal. And while that’s not everything…it’s a start. And that’s all my son needs.


5 responses to “Why Michael Jackson is important to me…”

  1. Isabel

    i love this post and i think it really speaks to how difficult it is to untangle expressions of sexuality for the joy of it from expressions of sexuality in the service of servicing gender roles. and dance is an important place to look at this because dance so often has sexuality as one of its elements.

    to look at this in kind of the reverse – i remember last year, i was at the city-wide training day for the girls mentoring program i enjoyed okay but wound up wishing i hadn’t done. and we were discussing in our groups (as you do at these things) issues our girls might be facing, etc. (3rd to 5th grade girls). and one of the other mentors said she was – okay, she probably didn’t actually say the word “scandalous” but it was kind of implied – by the way some young girls in that age range she knew danced, and it was so sad that at such a young age they were already feeling obligated to put on a show for boys.

    and i just couldn’t buy that it was that simple. the girls i’d worked with at my job the year before had danced in a way that i guess might look sexualized but… they were ten, and they mostly danced for each other and each other’s attention and praise, or in co-ed groups where the boys were dancing too. they danced for fun and joy and to get their energy out. and some of them were amazingly talented (which made me a little jealous cuz i can’t dance). and speaking as someone who still is pretty awkward and was REALLY awkward as a kid, the idea of being comfortable enough to shake your booty in public… is that really wholly negative? do we have to assume they’re only doing it for the boys, especially when, again, they do it most around each other?

    and it made me uncomfortable also that the demographics of the mentors were mostly white (which i mean, i sort of am also), and the kids we were going to work with, because the organization targets low-income neighborhoods which in boston are mostly non-white, would be mostly non-white and/or hispanic, and i remember wondering if this (white, to my eyes – though i mean, i’m white to other people’s eyes, so who even knows) girl was thinking of non-white girls and, if so, if she would have read their dancing as quite as sexual if they weren’t.

    so – i don’t know i that actually has anything to do with this post, or if the sleep-deprivation is making me think it does (entirely possible). but that’s what i thought of – the way our completely fucked up relationship to gender, sex, dancing, the body, etc. makes it so difficult for people to deal with or react to or handle things that in a perfect world would be easy, or natural, or complicated but not stressful, or… something. and the way everyone should have access to that outlet without being either forced to do it for gender-role-purposes or assumed to be doing it for gender-role-purposes.

  2. Sarah J

    yes. love this. it’s beautiful. and yeah, it says so much about how I feel about MJ, too–the way he was simply unthreatening while being sexual. Strangely, the only other male pop/rock star I read that way was Kurt Cobain.

    someday I’ll write that essay.

  3. OuyangDan

    This is such a wonderfully worded and beautiful post.

    I wouldn’t have thought to break it down in terms of sexuality the careful way that you did…but really, it’s so true and rings home a little bit for me, even if not in exactly the same way it did for you.

    Thanks for this.

  4. Tina H

    a man expressing sexuality that is not in service of women’s subjugation.

    Wow. Thank you for pointing that out.

What do you think?